Wednesday is the day when the Conservative Laestadian newspaper Päivämies comes out. Most of the topics dealt with aren’t very current; however, the editorial refers to some more topical issues and often gives me something to write about. This week the editorial referred to the service that has been a part of the opening to the parliamentary spring session.
Several times I have come across the metaphor of a nestling and an egg which has two shells; one of them representing the authority on earth and the other one the authority in heaven, both making sure that the egg is a safe place to grow. According to the editorial the earthly authority i.e. the state, has to take care that the children of God will make it safely to the kingdom of heaven. The editorial emphasizes that the state should be Christian and follow Christian values.
Seppo Lohi -- a visible person in the movement -- has once said that when proportioned to the size of the movement it has significant religious and social importance. No need to say, that these kinds of statements just underpin our research -- the relationship between the state and the Laestadian movement is quite an explicit one.
Another thing that I noticed whilst reading the paper, which I have come across several times lately is a statement which Conservative Laestadians tend to use when some issues are open to interpretation. In these cases it is common to use the part of the bible where the snake lures Eve to eat the apple – this is an example where too much thinking and pondering didn’t lead to a happy ending. I think that probably quite many people would say that this is just a way to “cover up” the statements or rules which don’t have any ground in the bible -- or at least not explicitly.
So these were the thoughts that I wanted to share with you.
I hope you all have a nice week!
-Mari
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
Seppo Lohi seemed to be convinced about the situation in Lapland about the attitudes to homosexual persons. His view that conservative laestadians enjoy high prestige also among the non-believers is interesting. Conversely, conservative laestadians usually emphasize the antagonism between their members and non-laestadian people, stressing that their values are not popular “in the world” at all.
I would be curious to hear his arguments to his view that also the non-laestadian people would share the conservative-laestadian values.
Markus
Post a Comment